High Court to hear appeal against gag order on "Aisha" documentary

Jun 18, 2026, 12:53 PM
The poster for the documentary 'Aisha' produced by Adhadhu — Photo: Adhadhu

The poster for the documentary 'Aisha' produced by Adhadhu — Photo: Adhadhu

The High Court has scheduled the appeal hearing against a Criminal Court gag order that banned the circulation of the "Aisha" documentary and prohibited the public from discussing any content featured in the production.

The appeal, filed by Adhadhu CEO Fiyaz Moosa is set to commence at 09:00 am on Monday, June 29.

Issued on May 10 by Criminal Court Judge Muzammil Nasir, the gag order applies to Fiyaz, editor Hassan Mohamed, the Prosecutor General’s Office, and the general public. The order was issued as Fiyaz and Hassan currently face Qazf charges (an Islamic criminal offence of falsely accusing someone of adultery or fornication) under Section 612 of the Penal Code in an ongoing Criminal Court case.

The Maldives Journalists Association (MJA) first attempted to appeal the order. However, the High Court Registrar rejected the filing on the grounds that the association was not a direct party to the case.

Following this, Fiyaz filed a separate appeal. Meanwhile, the MJA has petitioned the High Court’s Board of Judges to overturn the Registrar’s decision and allow their involvement.

The "Aisha" documentary details allegations regarding an extramarital affair between President Mohamed Muizzu and a staff member at the President’s Office. Muizzu has denied the allegations presented in the film.

Comments

Read More

Latest News

Life imprisonment for treason under proposed amendments

The Maldivian government has proposed a bill to classify treason as a first-degree felony punishable by life imprisonment. The amendment defines treason as waging war or threatening national sovereignty and bars convicts from state office. This move fulfills a campaign pledge by President Muizzu to impose harsher penalties for betraying the nation.

New amendment criminalises "intentional acts" to harm the economy

The government is amending the Penal Code to criminalize "intentional acts" that harm the economy, with penalties of up to 10 years in prison. Critics argue the law aims to suppress opposition to major state projects like the Rasmalé deal. This move, alongside new media controls, raises significant concerns regarding freedom of expression.

Anti-religious sentiment to be criminalised

The Maldives government has introduced a bill to criminalize genocide and public incitement against religious or ethnic groups. While officially aimed at international compliance, critics fear the broad language will be used to suppress dissent and activism against the Rasmalé deal and Zionist interests.

MDP MPs urge public referendum over Rasmale' deal

MDP lawmakers are calling for a public referendum over a deal to grant 500 hectares of Rasmalé land to a foreign company on a 99-year lease. The opposition argues that such a significant transfer of territory requires direct citizen approval. They insist the public must have the final say on the project's long-term implications.

Four Bangladeshis arrested for smuggling 6kg drugs

Four Bangladeshi nationals were arrested in the Maldives for smuggling 6.75kg of synthetic cathinones via air cargo. The suspects were remanded in custody following a joint operation by police and customs. Separately, a Maldivian man was detained for ingesting 19 drug-filled capsules.

Amendment to allow home-schooling for children with disabilities

MP Anara Naeem introduced an amendment to the Education Act to allow free home-schooling for children with disabilities. The bill permits exemptions from physical school attendance based on a child's specific needs and established guidelines. It also clarifies that those unable to participate in any schooling are exempt from requirements.

Turkish firm ordered to pay MVR 25 million in unpaid taxes

The Maldives High Court ordered Turkish firm Turmaks to pay MVR 25 million in unpaid GST for materials used to build Tree Top Hospital. The court upheld MIRA's assessment, rejecting the company's claim that a verbal agreement shifted tax liability. The ruling emphasizes that the burden of proof for tax exemptions lies with the taxpayer.

Newsletter

Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox