Former President Abdulla Yameen has said that his decision to collaborate with the opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) to hold President Mohamed Muizzu’s administration accountable is a national endeavor that transcends personal interests.
Speaking at a People’s National Front (PNF) rally last night, Yameen said that the current government’s actions have placed the Maldives' democratic system at risk.
Yameen claimed that misconduct is occurring within the administration and argued that there is currently no other viable way to ensure government accountability.
While acknowledging that he does not agree with the MDP’s philosophy or ideology, Yameen noted that the MDP is currently the only political entity active on the streets advocating for the rights of the people.
"We are facing the loss of our most fundamental rights, so why should I not work with the MDP? This is not a personal pursuit. This is work I am doing for the sake of the Maldivian people," Yameen said.
Appealing to his supporters, Yameen urged them to remain steadfast and assured them that he would not fail them.
"I want to tell my supporters to remain firm; I will not let them down. What we are engaged in is a much larger national mission," Yameen stated.
Yameen further explained that working with the MDP is a necessary step for national stability, even if disagreements remain on other issues. He suggested that the current flaws in the system could be rectified through concerted effort.
Criticizing the government, Yameen described the current climate in the Maldives as dangerously restrictive, claiming that people are now afraid to speak out or even draw a cartoon. He added that not even 10 percent of the population believes the current administration is operating in accordance with the law.
Addressing media freedom, Yameen expressed concern over the recently issued "gag order" restricting the disclosure of information.
He criticized the High Court’s decision to dismiss the Maldives Journalist Association’s (MJA) appeal against the order on the grounds of legal standing. Yameen questioned which parties, if not the journalists' association, would have the legal authority to challenge such orders.
